![]() ![]() ![]() Zerene gives the best final image by a large margin and the in camera stacking is noticeably better than Olympus Workspace. Helicon or Zerene - that is the questionChapters00:00 Intro & overview01:41 Bits & pieces05:32 The cost of free stacking software07:42 Bundles of joy11:16 Z. I have compared Zerene with Olympus Workspace and Olympus in camera stacking, by stacking the same bracketed images with all 3. Try them both to find out which interface you like the best and to decide if their output is worth the purchase price. It is self-contained and includes its own Java runtime environment. This bundle is suitable for Macs running macOS 10.9 through 10.14. zip file that automatically expands into an application bundle named ZereneStacker (.app). You can try both programmes for free, as each offer a free 30 day trial. macOS (interim): ZS-MacOSXinterim-SA-T-0715.zip, downloads as a. That being said, if youre interested in this technique, or you create focus stacks on a. The personal edition of Zerene is currently $89USD for a lifetime licence and the lite version of Helicon is $115USD. The most obvious of which being the price. I got the trial version of Helicon and tried using various stacking methods. The advantage of the Helicon approach is a simpler workflow.īoth programmes come in personal, enthusiast, and commercial variants with Zerene currently slightly cheaper in each version. The advantage of the Zerene approach is that it leaves raw conversion algorithms (and their updating) to the specialists. For several years now, advanced technologies such as HDR and EDoF have been paving the way for a world where stacked images are the norm. This is a powerful piece of editing software. Zerene's philosophy is to let the user use an external raw editor (Lightroom, Capture One, etc.) to convert raw files to 16bit TIFF files which are then imported into Zerene to be stacked. Below are two premium options for those looking for a more comprehensive piece of software for their stacking needs. One of the major differences in workflows is the way they handle raw files. ![]() Helicon has a more user friendly interface. The end results from either programme will be indistinguishable but their interfaces and workflow are different. Both do a very good job of stacking and offer the ability to edit the stacked images to correct any small stacking errors. There are two major specialist stacking programs, Zerene Stacker and Helicon Focus. By comparison, even on a 32-bit system, Zerene Stacker can process up to 40-50 TIFF files together in one stack with no problem. Focus stacking software: a post-processing technique that extends the depth of field in your photographs.To use this technique, you take several images of. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |